苹果缓慢而稳健的人工智能布局,正开始显得颇为明智。

qimuai 发布于 阅读:29 一手编译

苹果缓慢而稳健的人工智能布局,正开始显得颇为明智。

内容来源:https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/08/why-apples-slow-and-steady-ai-bet-is-starting-to-look-pretty-smart/

内容总结:

多年来,苹果一直被指责为人工智能军备竞赛中最大的落伍者之一。质疑者认为,苹果缺乏清晰的AI战略已使其失去优势,华尔街分析师则担忧这一差距可能开始影响iPhone销量。

如今,苹果发布了其号称迄今为止最大规模的AI产品:Siri AI。通过与谷歌Gemini的合作,苹果将新的自动化能力嵌入其软件的核心架构中。

这足以让人们不再说苹果在AI竞赛中“落败”了吗?

老实说,谁也说不准。但这个问题本身或许就问错了。更好的问题或许是:苹果用户真的会使用这些功能吗?如果会,它们能否帮助苹果提升业绩?

在探讨这个问题之前,值得注意的是,周一的发布中还有苹果软件工程高级副总裁克雷格·费德里吉的一段有趣评论。

“有些人似乎正在全速冲刺,仿佛为了AI而追求AI,却毫不顾及它最终应该服务的对象——我们所有人,”费德里吉在发言中表示,“在苹果,我们的使命始终是将先进技术的潜力转化为对每个人有用且直观的产品。”

这种毫不掩饰的“反叛”姿态,既是对苹果“AI落后论”的回应,也意在承认许多消费者对AI行业深感官行矛盾——甚至根据一些民调,负面情绪日益加剧——的现实。在美国人担心AI会夺走工作、腐蚀大脑的当下,这也不失为一条精明讯息:苹果正将自己定位为真正站在用户这边的AI公司。

从周一的演示来看,这种定位确实有实质内容支撑。新版Siri现在可以提取你收件箱或短信历史中深藏的信息,并根据这些信息提供有用的提示和建议。它可以利用苹果所谓的“屏幕感知”功能,结合你当前浏览内容提供上下文信息。并且——借助Gemini——它能近乎实时地从网络获取最新信息,直接呈现在你的设备上。

Siri还设计为可在苹果设备间无缝协作,为用户带来更高的灵活性。和其他AI聊天机器人一样,它也会保存聊天历史,方便用户回顾过往对话。

通过将AI功能融入其无形的虚拟助手,苹果还有可能蚕食竞争对手的优势——这些对手的应用程序只能通过苹果的App Store触达用户。对它们而言,苹果将AI嵌入操作系统层面,对其分发优势构成了实实在在的威胁。

这里的“可能”是关键,因为这一版Siri要到今年晚些时候才会以测试版形式向消费者开放。

最终定论尚需时日,但已清晰可见的是,苹果正竭尽全力讨好它的用户——无论他们最终是否买账。苹果本质上是一家硬件公司,这些更新旨在让硬件变得更加易用和便捷,从而让用户更长久地沉浸在自己的设备中。

与竞争对手的对比颇具启发性,或许也是周一发布中最值得关注的信号,对于任何关心AI行业真正走向的人来说都是如此。以OpenAI为例,尽管它以惊人的速度推送更新,却始终难以明确自己的销售对象,在消费者和企业用户之间摇摆不定。再看Meta,它向AI投入了巨额资金,却未能清晰解释这笔投资如何与其核心广告业务相关联。

相比之下,苹果更为稳健的策略开始显得最优——且财务上也更稳健。在很大程度上,苹果并不需要一套轰动性的AI战略。上一季度,它创下了iPhone销量的历史新高。而随着业界对AI的盈利能力和实际效用不断提出质疑,苹果的支出远低于竞争对手——今年计划资本支出约140亿美元,而其他科技巨头承诺的累计资本支出达9000亿美元——同时仍赚取着巨额收入。这些收入中有一部分正是来自AI行业本身:通过对使用其App Store分发应用的AI公司收取“苹果税”获得。

简而言之,苹果投入更少,赚得更多,如今又推出了一套AI功能——对许多iPhone用户而言,这些功能与他们在App Store中已能使用的其他AI应用几乎没有什么区别。如果这算不上“赢得AI竞赛”,那它或许就是最聪明的参赛方式。

中文翻译:

多年来,苹果一直被指责为人工智能竞赛中最大的落后者之一。质疑者认为,苹果缺乏清晰的人工智能战略使其失去了优势,而华尔街分析师则担忧这一差距可能开始影响iPhone销量。
如今,该公司发布了其声称迄今最大规模的人工智能产品:Siri AI。该产品通过与谷歌Gemini合作,将全新的自动化能力嵌入其软件核心。
这足以让人们停止说苹果在人工智能竞赛中“落后”吗?
说实话,没人真正知道。但这个问题本身或许就提错了。更恰当的问题或许是:苹果用户真的会使用这些功能吗?如果会,它们能帮助苹果的业务吗?
在回答这个问题之前,我们应注意到,周一发布的信息中还包含苹果软件工程高级副总裁克雷格·费德里吉的一番有趣评论。
“有些人似乎正在全速冲刺,仿佛为了人工智能而追逐人工智能,却并未明确顾及它最终要服务的人群——我们所有人,”费德里吉在发言中表示,“在苹果,我们的使命始终是将先进技术的潜力转化为对每个人都实用且直观的产品。”
这番毫不掩饰的挑衅既是对苹果“在人工智能领域落后”批评的回应,也试图承认许多消费者对人工智能行业深感矛盾——甚至根据一些民调,持日益负面看法——的态度。在美国民众担忧人工智能会抢走工作、侵蚀智力的当下,这也不失为一条精明讯息。苹果正将自己定位为真正站在用户一边的人工智能公司。
从周一的演示来看,这种定位背后确有实质内容。如今Siri能调取深藏于收件箱或短信记录中的信息,并据此给出有帮助的建议。它能利用苹果所谓的“屏幕感知”功能,为用户提供正在查看内容的上下文信息。同时,借助Gemini,它还能几乎即时从网络获取最新信息,直接传送到用户设备上。
Siri还设计为能在苹果设备间无缝协作,赋予用户更高灵活性。与其他人工智能聊天机器人一样,它会保存聊天记录,方便用户回顾过往对话。
通过将人工智能功能融入其无形、缥缈的虚拟助手,苹果还有可能蚕食竞争对手的优势——这些竞争对手的应用只能通过苹果自己的App Store触达用户。对于这些对手而言,苹果将人工智能嵌入操作系统层面,对其分发优势构成了实质性威胁。
这里的关键词是“潜力”,因为这一版Siri要到今年晚些时候才会以测试版形式面向消费者。
最终结论尚需等待,但已明确的是苹果正竭力争取用户——无论他们最终是否买账。苹果显然是一家硬件公司,这些更新旨在让硬件逐步更易用、更便捷,使用户能更长久地沉浸在其设备中。
与其竞争对手的对比颇具启示意义,或许也是周一发布中最值得关注的信号,尤其对关注人工智能行业走向的人而言。以OpenAI为例,尽管其更新迭代速度惊人,却始终难以明确自身销售对象,在消费者与企业用户之间摇摆不定。再如Meta,虽向人工智能投入巨资,却未清晰说明其与公司核心广告业务的关联。
相比之下,苹果更为审慎的策略开始显得更优——且在财务上更稳健。很大程度上,苹果并不需要一套激进的人工智能战略。上季度其iPhone销量创下历史新高。随着人们对人工智能盈利能力和实际效用的质疑增多,苹果的支出远低于竞争对手——今年计划资本支出约140亿美元,而其他科技巨头累计承诺资金达9000亿美元——却依然赚取巨额收入。这笔收入中有一部分正来自人工智能行业本身:苹果通过向使用其App Store分发应用的人工智能公司收取“过路费”获利。
简言之,苹果支出更少、收入更多,如今又推出一套人工智能功能——对许多iPhone用户而言,这些功能与他们在App Store上已可使用的其他人工智能应用几乎别无二致。即便这算不上“赢得人工智能竞赛”,它或许正是最明智的参赛方式。

英文来源:

For years, Apple has been accused of being one of the biggest stragglers in the AI arms race. Doubters have argued that Apple’s lack of a clear AI strategy have cost it its edge, and Wall Street analysts have worried that the gap could start hurting iPhone sales.
Now, the company has unveiled what it is billing as its biggest AI launch to date: Siri AI, which embeds new automated capabilities (fueled by a partnership with Google Gemini) into the very spine of its software.
Is it enough to get people to stop saying that Apple is “losing” the AI race?
To be honest, nobody really knows. But the question itself may be the wrong one. A better one might be: are Apple customers actually going to use these features and, if they do, will it help Apple’s business?
Before we address that question, we should note that Monday’s announcements also came with an interesting comment from Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering.
“Some appear to be racing forward, seemingly pursuing AI for the sake of AI, without clear regard for the people — all of us — that it’s ultimately meant to serve,” Federighi said during his remarks. “At Apple, our mission has always been to turn the potential of advanced technology into helpful and intuitive products for everyone.”
The not-so-veiled defiance on display here seems like both a response to Apple’s “behind-on-AI” criticism and an effort to acknowledge the deeply ambivalent — and, according to some polls, increasingly negative — sentiments that many consumers have about the AI industry. It’s also a shrewd message at a moment when Americans are worried that AI will take their jobs and rot their brains. Apple is positioning itself as the AI company that’s actually on your side.
Judging by Monday’s demos, that positioning has some substance behind it. Siri can now surface information buried deep in your inbox or text history and surface helpful information and offer helpful suggestions based on it. It can use what Apple calls onscreen awareness to give you context about what you’re looking at. And — using Gemini — it can pull near-instantaneous up-to-date information from the web and deliver it right to your device.
Siri is also designed to work seamlessly across Apple devices, giving users increased flexibility and, like other AI chatbots, it stores chat histories so users can revisit past conversations.
By building AI functionalities into its disembodied, ethereal assistant, Apple also has the potential to eat into the advantages of competitors whose apps can only reach users through its own App Store. For those competitors, having Apple’s AI embedded at the operating system level is a meaningful threat to their distribution advantage.
The keyword here is “potential” since this version of Siri won’t be available to consumers until later this year, as a beta.
A final verdict will have to wait, but what’s already clear is that Apple is doing its best to court its audience — whether they end up going for it or not. Apple is obviously a hardware company, and these updates are designed to make that hardware incrementally more user-friendly and convenient, keeping users glued to their devices a little while longer.
The contrast with its competitors is instructive and maybe the most important signal in Monday’s announcements for anyone watching where the AI industry is actually headed. Take OpenAI, which, despite shipping updates at a relentless pace, has struggled to define who it’s actually selling to, oscillating between consumers and enterprises. Or Meta, which is pouring gargantuan sums into AI without a clear explanation of how it connects to the company’s core advertising business.
Apple’s more measured approach is starting to look optimal by comparison — and more financially sound. For the most part, Apple hasn’t needed a gangbusters AI strategy. It posted historic iPhone sales last quarter. And as questions mount over AI’s profitability and real-world utility, Apple is spending significantly less than its competitors — roughly $14 billion in capex planned this year, against a cumulative $900 billion being committed by other tech giants — while still earning huge amounts of revenue. That revenue has come from the AI industry itself via taxes on AI companies that use its App Store to platform their apps.
In short, Apple is spending less, making more, and now launched a suite of AI features that — for many iPhone users — will feel indistinguishable from the other AI applications already available to them through the App Store. If that doesn’t exactly count as “winning the AI race,” it may be the smartest way to run it.

TechCrunchAI大撞车

文章目录


    扫描二维码,在手机上阅读