内容来源：https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/949601/amazon-anthropic-fablemythos-government-ban

内容总结：

《华尔街日报》披露：亚马逊安全研究引发白宫对Anthropic AI模型出口限制

据《华尔街日报》报道，美国人工智能企业Anthropic近期被限制向海外用户提供其核心模型Fable 5和Mythos 5，这一出口管制指令部分源于亚马逊的网络安全研究报告，以及亚马逊CEO安迪·贾西与白宫方面的沟通。报道称，亚马逊的研究显示，通过一系列特定提示词，能够诱导Fable 5输出可用于网络攻击的信息。目前亚马逊尚未对此事作出回应。

CEO与白宫沟通后出口管制随即出台

贾西在向政府分享安全发现后不久，美国政府即决定禁止外国用户访问这些模型。而这一禁令的复杂性在于，Anthropic的许多研究人员本身就是外籍人士，这意味着他们也被禁止访问自己参与研发的产品。

Anthropic反驳“越狱”定性，质疑白宫动机

Anthropic在声明中否认政府所称的“越狱”问题，指出类似漏洞在其他公开模型中同样存在，包括GPT 5.5。部分安全专家也支持这一说法。网络安全公司LutaSecurity创始人兼CEO凯蒂·穆苏里斯在BlueSky上表示：“我看过那篇论文，这并非‘越狱’。”前商务部官员凯特·科伦则向《华尔街日报》分析称，白宫对Anthropic的“不待见”可能影响了这一决策。

矛盾由来已久：拒绝监控与致命武器应用

Anthropic与特朗普政府的分歧已持续多时。该公司拒绝将其AI用于大规模监控美国公民或驱动致命自主武器。今年2月，特朗普曾指示联邦机构停止使用Anthropic的AI产品，数小时后，国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯便将该公司列为供应链风险。尽管双方一度通过合作扩大Mythos模型访问权限而有所缓和，但如今似乎再度陷入冲突。

中文翻译：

据《华尔街日报》报道，导致Anthropic切断对Fable 5和Mythos 5访问权限的出口管制指令，部分源于亚马逊的网络安全研究以及CEO安迪·贾西与白宫的对话。报道称，亚马逊的研究报告声称，通过一系列提示词，他们成功让Fable 5提供了可用于网络攻击的信息。亚马逊尚未回应置评请求。

亚马逊安全研究据报促成白宫对Anthropic Fable的禁令
在出口管制指令颁布前不久，CEO安迪·贾西曾就安全问题与官员进行沟通。
贾西将公司研究成果提交给政府后不久，政府便决定禁止外国公民使用该产品。令问题更加复杂的是，Anthropic的许多研究人员系外籍出身，这意味着他们也被禁止访问自己的产品。

Anthropic在一份声明中反驳了政府将此事定性为"越狱"的说法。该公司认为，包括GPT 5.5在内的其他公开可用模型同样存在许多相同的漏洞。部分安全研究员似乎支持该公司的观点。LutaSecurity创始人兼CEO凯蒂·穆苏里斯在BlueSky上发帖称："我看过那篇论文，这并非越狱行为。"前商务部官员凯特·科伦向《华尔街日报》推测，白宫对Anthropic的反感可能影响了这一决定。

Anthropic与特朗普政府因该公司拒绝让AI用于大规模监控美国公民或制造致命自主武器而长期存在分歧。今年二月，特朗普指示联邦机构停止使用Anthropic的AI。数小时后，国防部长皮特·赫格塞特将该企业列为供应链风险。

政府与公司本已达成和解，双方曾合作扩大Mythos的访问权限。然而如今，两者似乎注定再次交锋。

英文来源：

According to the Wall Street Journal, the export control directive that led to Anthropic cutting off access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 was triggered in part by cybersecurity research from Amazon and conversations between CEO Andy Jassy and the White House. According to the report, the paper from Amazon claims that, through a series of prompts, it was able to get Fable 5 to serve up information that could be used in cyberattacks. Amazon has yet to respond to a request for comment.
Amazon security research reportedly led to the White House’s Anthropic Fable ban
CEO Andy Jassy spoke with officials about security concerns shortly before the export control directive.
CEO Andy Jassy spoke with officials about security concerns shortly before the export control directive.
Shortly after Jassy shared the company’s findings with the government, it made the call to block its use by foreign nationals. Complicating this issue is that many of Anthropic’s researchers are foreign-born, meaning they were barred from accessing their own product.
In a statement, Anthropic disputed the government’s characterization of the issue as a “jailbreak.” It argued that many of the same vulnerabilities could be discovered using other publicly available models, including GPT 5.5. Some security researchers appear to back the company’s interpretation. Katie Moussouris, the founder and CEO of LutaSecurity posted on BlueSky that “I’ve seen the paper. It’s not a jailbreak.” Former Commerce Department official Kate Koren speculated to the WSJ that the White House’s dislike of Anthropic may have influenced the decision.
Anthropic and the Trump administration have been at odds for some time over the company’s refusal to allow its AI to be used for mass surveillance of Americans or to power lethal autonomous weapons. In February, Trump instructed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s AI. And just hours later, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth designated the company a supply chain risk.
The government and the company seemed to have made amends, and the two had worked together to expand access to Mythos. However, now the two seem destined to clash again.