内容来源：https://lifehacker.com/tech/protect-privacy-meta-glasses-recording?utm_medium=RSS

内容总结：

Meta智能眼镜陷隐私争议：用户如何防范被偷录？

随着Meta智能眼镜热销，其潜在的隐私风险日益引发公众担忧。尽管公司正采取措施提高录音的可见性，但仍无法从根本上杜绝被偷录的可能。若怀疑他人正利用智能眼镜未经同意拍摄自己，您可采取以下应对措施。

明确法律权利：分清场合与同意原则

了解相关法律虽不能立即阻止偷拍，却是维权的基石。判断对方是否违法，通常考量两点：您是否拥有合理的隐私期待，以及您所在州是“一方同意”还是“双方同意”录音。

在美国，“合理隐私期待”是核心法律原则。例如，即便拍摄者身处公共街道，若将镜头对准他人窗内，屋主在自家住宅内（即便窗户开启）仍享有隐私权，此行为即属违法。同理，智能眼镜拍摄若发生在您有合理隐私期待的场所（如家中、酒店房间、卫生间），则构成侵权。

在录音同意方面，部分州要求对话双方均同意才能录音，而有的州仅需一方同意。关键在于，录制者必须本身是对话的参与者。任何在旁窃听或偷拍的第三方，即使在公共开放场所，也无权侵犯您的合理隐私。此外，在“双方同意”州，即便佩戴者参与了对话，未经您同意的录制也可能违法。当然，在完全开放的公共街道，或餐厅、商店等虽属私人产权但对公众开放的场所，上述限制通常不适用。尽管如此，了解自身权利仍有必要，它能让您在事后要求删除影像或采取法律行动时更有底气。若事件发生在您私宅内，您有权直接要求对方离开。

求助场所管理者：利用私人空间规则

法律权利在对方执意纠缠时可能显得乏力。例如今年早些时候，一名男子在拍摄现场骚扰英国喜剧演员Diane Morgan，即便可能面临骚扰指控也毫不退缩。在公共可进入的场所，最有效的办法是向该场所的所有者或管理者求助。您或许无权制止某人在星巴克内拍摄，但店长有权将滋事者请出店外。目前，一些场所和组织已明令禁止佩戴具备拍摄功能的眼镜，建议您熟悉常去的商店、酒吧或书店的相关规定，以便在被尾随拍摄时，能迅速找到安全庇护所或寻求帮助。

实用防偷拍技巧：技术与非技术手段

若无法让对方停止拍摄，可尝试以下更为主动的策略：

• 使用“Nearby Glasses”应用：这款开源应用适用于安卓和iOS系统，通过扫描附近设备的蓝牙信号，尝试识别周围是否存在智能眼镜。但需注意，其并非百分百准确，且只能提示附近有设备，无法确定佩戴者是谁。在向不确定的对象质询时请务必谨慎。
• 警惕指示灯被破坏：Meta智能眼镜本应通过LED指示灯向周围人提示正在录像，近期更新也宣称若指示灯被遮挡将自动停止录制。但眼镜仍可能被硬件改装以规避提示。若发现有人佩戴明显经过改造的眼镜以隐藏录制状态，这将是需要高度警惕并采取行动的关键信号。
• 谨慎使用“音乐干扰”：网络上流传播放某家以诉讼闻名的公司的受版权保护音乐，可使偷录视频上传后被下架。但平台处理版权问题的方式并不统一，内容可能只是被降权或静音，版权系统未必能有效解决问题。与其寄望于版权方，不如主动向平台提出隐私投诉，要求删除相关视频，这往往更为直接有效。当然，用音乐掩盖对话内容本身也并无大碍，但不宜作为主要依赖手段。

中文翻译：

Meta的智能眼镜正逐渐赢得一个名声——成为隐私噩梦，这还说得算是轻的。虽然该公司正在采取措施，让他人更难在不知情的情况下被录制，但仍然无法阻止有人被拍下来。那么，如果你觉得有人正在未经你同意用眼镜录制你，你能做些什么呢？

了解被录制时你享有的权利

了解对方是否合法有权录制你，未必能保护你不被拍下来，但这是一个坚实的起点。而判断对方能否录制你，通常归结为两个基本问题：你是否对隐私有合理的期待？你所在的州是“一方同意”还是“双方同意”制？

在美国，“合理隐私期待”是一项法律原则，可帮助判断你是否享有不被录制的权利（在其他司法管辖区，这一概念可能有不同的名称或标准）。最经典的例子是：一个人站在外面的街道上，但把摄像头对准他人窗户内部。即使录制者从技术上来说是“在公共场合”，被录制的对象也有合理的期待，即身处自己家中理应享有隐私——是的，即使窗户是开着的。

就智能眼镜而言，这一原则与其他任何摄像头一样适用。如果有人试图在你对隐私有合理期待的地方——例如你的家中、酒店房间或洗手间——录制你，那么他们在法律上就是错误的。

在美国，在对隐私有合理期待的地方，有些州要求对话双方都同意才能录制，而另一些州只要求一方同意即可。这里的关键是，在所有情况下，录制者必须是对话的参与者。第三方通过将摄像头或麦克风对准你来偷听，在任何你可以合理期待隐私的地方，都绝无权利录制你。

这也意味着，即使戴智能眼镜的人是对话参与者之一，如果你身处“双方同意”制的州，录制你仍然可能是违法的。显然，当你在公共场所，甚至是在向公众开放的私人场所（如餐厅或商店）时，以上这些都不适用，但了解你的权利通常是值得的。

仅仅因为你拥有合法的隐私权，并不意味着你能阻止别人录制你，但这可以让你处于更有利的位置，以便日后要求删除包含你的影像，或就此采取法律行动。而且如果你控制着某人正在录制你的空间——比如在你自己家中——你随时可以让他们离开。

求助场所的管理方

当面对一个不肯罢休的人时，你的合法权利在当下能起到的作用是有限的。以今年早些时候的一起事件为例，一名男子拍摄了自己在英国喜剧演员黛安·摩根拍摄中途上前搭讪的视频。虽然在这起事件中，摄制组显然没有合法的隐私权，可能也没有合法权利将闯入者赶走，但拍摄者显然也没有因为可能面临骚扰指控而被震慑住。那么，如果某人就是不肯罢休，你能做什么呢？

在公众可进入的场所，你最好的选择大概是找到你所处场所的所有者或管理者。你可能没有能力阻止某人在星巴克内录制你，但如果他们制造麻烦，店长可以将他们赶出去。一些场所和组织已经开始全面禁止使用具备录制功能的眼镜——所以熟悉你常去的本地商家的政策是值得的。

如果你觉得有人在公共场所录制你，了解当地是否有禁止此类眼镜的酒吧或书店会很有帮助。即使只是为了在附近有人录制你时有个地方可以躲进去，或者知道该向谁求助以制止某人来骚扰你。

更多防止被录制的技巧

让对方完全停止录制或观察你是理想的情况，但如果这不可行，你可能不得不求助于一些更有创意的办法，包括但不限于以下几种：

试试“Nearby Glasses”应用。这款开源应用适用于Android和iOS系统，可以识别附近的智能眼镜。它通过附近设备的蓝牙数据来判断你周围是否有智能眼镜存在。它并非百分之百可靠，但可以作为一个有用的参考指标。另外，不用多说也应知道，知道附近有人佩戴智能眼镜，并不意味着你知道具体是谁在戴。所以在贸然接近某个你不确定是否佩戴眼镜的人之前，务必小心。

留意通知LED灯是否有被篡改的迹象。Meta的智能眼镜本应有一颗LED灯来提醒周围的人正在录制中。最近的一次更新据称可以确保如果LED灯被遮挡，录制将自动停止，但仍有可能通过改装眼镜来绕过这一机制。如果有人未经你许可录制你，这已经够糟糕了，但如果你看到某人显然改装了智能眼镜以防止他人注意到录制指示灯，那就更需要格外重视并采取行动。

别费劲播放迪士尼音乐了。你经常会看到一个建议：播放来自某家特别好诉讼的公司的版权音乐。这个思路是，如果违规录制者试图将视频上传到YouTube或TikTok之类的平台，那么视频可能因版权问题而被下架。

但这并不是这些平台的常见运作方式。内容确实可能因版权主张而被下架，但同样常见的情况是，它可能只是被取消变现资格或仅仅被静音。而在这些情况下，版权系统并不能真正帮到你。播放音乐来掩盖对话可能不会有害，但与其指望迪士尼来救你，不如依靠你自己提出的隐私投诉来让视频下架。

英文来源：

Meta’s smart glasses are earning a reputation for being a privacy nightmare—to put it mildly. While the company is taking steps to make it harder to record people without their knowledge, it’s still not possible to prevent being recorded. So, what can you do if you think someone is using their glasses to record you without your consent?
Know your rights if someone is recording you
Knowing whether or not someone is legally allowed to record you won’t necessarily protect you from being recorded, but it’s a solid foundation to start with. And determining whether someone can record you generally boils down to two basic questions: Do you have a reasonable expectation of privacy? And do you live in a one- or two-party consent state?
In the United States, a reasonable expectation of privacy is a legal principle that can help determine whether you have a right not to be recorded (in other jurisdictions, this concept may have a different name or criteria). The classic example of this would be standing outside on the street, but pointing a camera inside a person’s window. Even though the person recording outside is technically “in public,” the subject being recorded has a reasonable expectation that being inside their home entitles them to privacy—yes, even if the window is open.
When it comes to smart glasses, this principle applies as it would with any other camera. If someone tries to record you in a place where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy—your home, hotel room, or a bathroom, for example—then they are legally in the wrong.
Within places that have a reasonable expectation of privacy, some places in the U.S. require that both parties to a conversation consent to it being recorded, while others require only one party to consent. The key here is that in all cases, the person recording must be a participant in the conversation. A third party listening in by pointing a camera or a microphone at you never has a right to record you in a place where you can reasonably expect privacy.
This also means that even if the person wearing smart glasses is part of the conversation, recording you still might be illegal if you’re in a two-party consent state. Obviously, none of this applies when you’re in public places, or even on private property that’s open to the public like a restaurant or store, but it’s usually worth knowing your rights.
Just because you have a legal right to privacy doesn’t mean you can prevent someone from recording you, but it can put you in a better position to have footage of you taken down or taking legal action against it in the future. And if you control the space where someone is recording you—say, inside your own home—you can always have them removed.
Appeal to private authorities
Your legal rights only matter so much in the moment if you’re faced with someone who won’t take no for an answer. Take this incident earlier this year, where a man filmed himself accosting British comedian Diane Morgan in the middle of a shoot. While the film crew in this instance obviously didn’t have a legal right to privacy, and probably did not have a legal right to remove the intruder, the person filming also clearly wasn’t deterred by potentially incurring a harassment charge. So, what can you do if someone simply won’t relent?
In public-accessible spaces, your best bet is likely to find whoever owns or manages the space you’re in. You might not have the ability to stop someone from recording you inside a Starbucks, but the manager can kick them out if they’re causing a problem. Some places and organizations have started banning the use of recording-capable glasses altogether—so it's worth familiarizing yourself with the policies of the local businesses where you hang out.
If you think someone’s recording you in public, it can be helpful to know if there’s a local bar or bookstore that bans these glasses. Even if it’s just to have a place to duck into if someone is recording you nearby, or to know who to ask for help to get someone to stop bothering you.
More tips to prevent being recorded
Getting someone to stop recording or observing you entirely is the ideal, but if that’s not an option, you might have to resort to some more creative solutions. Including, but not limited to the following:
Try the Nearby Glasses app. This open-source application is available for Android and iOS, and can potentially identify nearby smart glasses. It uses Bluetooth data from nearby devices to try to determine if any smart glasses are in your vicinity. It’s not 100% reliable, but it can be a helpful indicator. It should also go without saying, but knowing that someone nearby has smart glasses doesn’t mean you know who is wearing them. So be careful before approaching someone that you’re not sure is wearing them.
Watch for signs of tampering on the notification LED. Meta’s smart glasses are supposed to have an LED that alerts people around the user that a recording is in progress. A recent update is supposed to ensure that recording will cease if the LED is covered, but it’s still possible to tamper with the glasses to prevent this. It’s not great if someone is recording you without your permission, but if you see someone who appears to have visibly modified their smart glasses to prevent people from noticing the recording, then it’s extra important to take action.
Don’t bother playing Disney music. One common tip you’ll find is to play copyrighted music from a particularly litigious company. The idea here is that, if the offending recorder tries to upload the footage to a site like YouTube or TikTok, then it could potentially get removed on copyright grounds.
This isn’t really how those platforms often work. Content can get taken down due to a copyright claim, but just as often it can either get demonetized or simply muted. And in those cases, the copyright system isn’t really going to help you. Playing music to drown out a conversation might not hurt, but it’s better to rely on your own privacy complaints to take down videos, rather than hoping Disney will save you.