圆桌讨论：人工智能的末日危机
内容来源：https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/09/11/1143936/roundtables-will-ai-really-kill-us-all/
内容总结：
《麻省理工科技评论》将于9月15日举办线上圆桌讨论，聚焦人工智能“灭绝风险”争议。届时，该刊执行主编尼尔·弗斯将与高级AI编辑威尔·道格拉斯·海文及AI记者格蕾丝·哈金斯展开对话，探讨全球顶尖AI实验室员工所提出的“先进AI可能毁灭人类”这一说法是否成立，究竟是真实威胁还是危言耸听。讨论将围绕相关担忧的来源、其合理性以及应对之策展开。活动面向订阅用户，于英国夏令时16:00、美国东部时间11:00、太平洋时间8:00直播。
中文翻译：
圆桌讨论：AI的末日危机
立即注册，参加一场仅限订阅者参与的对谈，深入解析AI灭绝恐惧。
全球顶尖AI实验室的员工表示，先进AI确实有可能毁灭人类。他们说得对吗？还是这更多是危言耸听和炒作？加入《麻省理工科技评论》执行主编尼尔·弗斯的对话，与资深AI编辑威尔·道格拉斯·希文和AI记者格蕾丝·哈金斯一起深入探讨AI灭绝恐惧：这些恐惧从何而来，是否站得住脚，如果站得住脚，我们又该怎么做。
直播时间：9月15日星期二，英国夏令时16:00 / 美国东部时间上午11:00 / 太平洋时间上午8:00
嘉宾：执行主编尼尔·弗斯，资深AI编辑威尔·道格拉斯·希文，AI记者格蕾丝·哈金斯
相关报道
- AI智能体为何会为了达成目标而撒谎和作弊
- AI的递归自我改进或许终究不会来得那么快
- 比尔·盖茨说我们已经越过了AI的危险阈值。接下来该怎么办？
- OpenAI智能体为何入侵Hugging Face的内幕
深度解读
人工智能
一个根本性缺陷让大语言模型极易受到攻击
这让人们很容易诱骗它们做出不该做的事，比如告诉你怎么破坏飞机的导航系统。
AI在招聘时比人类更容易形成偏见
AI不只是从训练数据中学习刻板印象。它还能制造出新的刻板印象。
AI智能体为何会为了达成目标而撒谎和作弊
这种不当行为被称为奖励黑客。以下是你需要了解的内容。
AI的递归自我改进或许终究不会来得那么快
看来，AI智能体还不够有创造力，无法开展真正具有创新性的开放式AI研究。
保持联系
获取《麻省理工科技评论》的最新动态
发现特别优惠、热门报道、即将举办的活动等更多内容。
英文来源：
Roundtables: AI’s apocalypse crisis
Register now for a subscriber-only conversation unpacking AI extinction fears.
Employees at the world's leading AI labs are saying there's a real possibility that advanced AI could destroy humanity. Are they right? Or is this more scaremongering and hype? Join MIT Technology Review executive editor Niall Firth for a conversation with senior AI editor Will Douglas Heaven and AI reporter Grace Huckins unpacking AI extinction fears: where they come from, whether they hold any water, and, if so, what we should do.
Going live on Tuesday, September 15 at 16:00 BST / 11:00am EST / 8:00am PST
Speakers: Niall Firth, executive editor, Will Douglas Heaven, senior AI editor, and Grace Huckins, AI reporter
Related Stories
- Here’s why AI agents lie and cheat to reach their goals
- AI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after all
- Bill Gates says we’ve passed AI’s danger thresholds. Now what?
- The inside story on why OpenAI agents hacked Hugging Face
Deep Dive
Artificial intelligence
A fundamental flaw leaves LLMs strikingly vulnerable to attack
It makes it easy to trick them into doing things they shouldn’t, such as telling you how to sabotage an aircraft’s navigation system.
AI is more likely than humans to form biases when hiring
AI doesn’t just learn stereotypes from its training. It can cook up new ones, too.
Here’s why AI agents lie and cheat to reach their goals
The misbehavior is called reward hacking. This is what you need to know.
AI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after all
AI agents are not yet creative enough to carry out genuinely innovative open-ended AI research, it seems.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.