内容来源：https://www.wired.com/story/onlyfans-creators-are-pissed-that-meta-lets-muse-talk-dirty/

内容总结：

纽约OnlyFans创作者Vanniall正面临生成式AI带来的困扰。她发现大量以她为原型的深度伪造图片和视频在网上流传，且往往无法成功申请删除。与此同时，她在Instagram等主流社交平台上频繁遭遇账号受限或申诉问题，其拥有超10万粉丝的账号目前处于受限状态，未登录无法查看。

令Vanniall不满的是，Meta允许其AI助手Muse与成年用户进行露骨的性对话。她认为这并不公平：“他们的AI agent可以靠性内容从用户身上赚钱，却不允许真实成年人从事任何感性或性相关的表达。”多位成人内容创作者也提出了类似质疑。

Meta发言人Tracy Clayton回应称，成年用户在仅限18岁以上人群使用的平台上与个性化AI助手进行私密一对一对话，与在社交媒体平台上营销推广服务“非常不同”。Muse是Meta推出的常驻AI助手应用，用户可通过短信式界面与其交互，授权访问日历、邮件等个人数据后，Muse会主动提供帮助。Meta表示不会“阻止合法的成年人行为”，Muse可生成露骨文字内容，但不生成图片或视频。

与美国其他平台不同，Meta对Instagram的内容审核较为严格，而X和Bluesky等平台则允许成人内容，许多OnlyFans创作者依靠这些平台吸引订阅者和联系粉丝。

长期从事酷儿色情行业的OnlyFans创作者Jiz Lee表示，AI正被允许做人类会受限的事情。Lee认为大型社交平台对酷儿和跨性别群体存在不公平对待，并将许多网络审查问题追溯到2018年签署的FOSTA-SESTA法案，该法案影响了平台的Section 230保护，导致许多网站审查成人内容。Lee还关注Muse的训练数据来源及是否有人获得补偿，并注意到越来越多的成人内容公司开始在合同中明确AI使用立场，以保护表演者不被纳入AI训练数据。

OnlyFans创作者兼成人电影演员Tony Genius表示，行业内对AI agent的广告在颁奖典礼上常遭嘘声。他担忧完全由AI生成的色情内容未来可能取代真人表演者，但也认为当前AI工具对独立创作者的某些营销工作有帮助。他指出，许多创作者在Meta平台上频繁被封号，他自称过去五年用了第七个Instagram账号。他质疑Meta为何只为Muse设置18岁以上门槛，却不考虑在社交媒体上另设成人空间。

Genius表示愿意与科技公司合作创建自己的AI版本供粉丝互动，但希望确保真人表演者不被排除在外或数据被不公平利用。他认为当下人与人的真实连接仍是核心。

Vanniall则坚决反对使用任何AI agent，尤其是Meta的Muse。她呼吁：“别再下载那个应用了，你不需要再给Meta更多钱或更多个人信息。他们已经够多了。”

中文翻译：

生成式AI革命对居住在纽约的OnlyFans创作者瓦尼亚尔并不友好。她现在不断发现网上流传着高度逼真的深度伪造内容——即复制她一切特征的AI生成图像和视频——而且往往无法将这些内容下架。

除此之外，瓦尼亚尔还要在Instagram等主流社交媒体平台上努力积累粉丝，同时避免惹上麻烦。“我总是要经历某种举报或申诉流程，”她告诉《连线》杂志。瓦尼亚尔的Instagram账号拥有超过10万粉丝，目前处于受限状态，不登录就无法查看。

因此，当我告诉她Meta允许其名为Muse的AI代理与成年用户进行露骨的色情对话时，她似乎对这一决定感到不满：“他们可以用他们的性活跃AI代理从人们身上赚钱，却不允许真实的人、真正的成年人进行任何形式的性感或性表达，这不公平。”

这是我从其他成人内容创作者那里经常听到的抱怨，他们质疑为什么自己在Meta平台上的账号似乎经常受到限制，而Meta的AI代理现在却可以和数百万成年用户说荤话。

“成年人与个性化AI代理在仅限18岁以上用户使用的平台上进行私密的一对一对话，与在社交媒体平台上营销和推广服务是非常不同的，”Meta发言人特雷西·克莱顿告诉《连线》杂志。

Meta的Muse是第一个走出旧金山早期采用者圈子的始终在线AI代理。Muse应用就像一个消息线程；给这个数字助手发消息，授予它访问你个人数据（如日历和电子邮件）的权限，让它主动寻找帮助你的方式，比如取消与你晚餐预订时间冲突的健身课。Meta通过Instagram和Facebook等平台构建的庞大分发网络，帮助该应用在第一个月就冲上下载排行榜榜首，数百万新用户首次体验了AI代理。

Meta表示，除了让它帮你整理日历之外，这个仅限成人使用的应用的用户还可以与Muse进行X级AI对话。Meta发言人此前告诉《连线》杂志，公司不会“阻止合法的成人行为”。Meta的Muse生成露骨文字，但不生成图像或视频。

虽然Meta在Instagram上采取不同的审核方式，但美国其他社交媒体平台确实允许色情内容。X仍然是许多OnlyFans创作者吸引新订阅者和与粉丝互动的最受欢迎平台之一。许多成人表演者在埃隆·马斯克接管这个原名Twitter的平台后也迁移到了Bluesky，用户在那里也可以分享成人内容。

“我认为我们已经看到AI被允许做的事情比人类能逃脱的更多，”李吉兹说，他经营着一个OnlyFans账号，多年来一直在酷儿色情行业从事幕后工作。Meta此前曾标记李的Instagram帖子要求删除。李觉得酷儿和跨性别者经常受到大型社交媒体公司的不公平对待，无论对方是否是成人内容创作者。

李将许多网络审查问题追溯到FOSTA-SESTA——2018年由特朗普总统签署的一项法律，该法律影响了平台的第230条保护，许多网站因此对成人内容进行审查。“如果性工作非罪化，那么很多这些问题就不会发生，很多审查就不会发生，”他们说。

李还想更多地了解Muse是如何训练的，以及是否有人因他们的数据而从Meta获得了报酬。“我们在行业层面反应迟缓，”他们说。但李开始看到更多成人内容公司在官方合同中明确AI使用立场。他们希望保护表演者不被吞入AI训练数据。

“当我们在颁奖典礼上，公司为AI代理做广告时，他们真的会被嘘得很惨，”托尼·吉尼斯说，他也拥有一个OnlyFans账号并出演成人影片。他担心未来完全由AI生成的色情内容可能取代人类表演者。他也认为当前的AI工具对独立创作者的一些营销工作有帮助，比如使用自动化工具为社交媒体剪辑视频片段。

对许多OnlyFans创作者来说，在Meta平台上运营令人沮丧，但对保持在线可见度至关重要。吉尼斯声称过去五年里他用了第七个Instagram账号。

当被问及Muse的色情短信功能时，他质疑为什么Meta将其旗下应用Muse设为18岁以上才能使用，但似乎对在社交媒体上创建另一个仅限成人的空间不感兴趣。“可以叫：Instacam，”他说。

Muse生成成人内容可以为更广泛的受众提供露骨的AI互动。吉尼斯表示他愿意与科技公司合作创建一个AI版的自己，粉丝可以给他发消息。他希望找到让人类作为成人表演者继续赚钱的方法，确保他们不会被排除在外或被不公平地用于训练。目前，他认为自己的人性和真实性是与观众建立联系的核心。

与此同时，瓦尼亚尔坚决反对使用任何AI代理。好吧，至少是Meta的Muse。“别再下载那个应用了，”她说。“你不需要再给Meta更多钱或更多个人信息。他们已经够多了。”

评论

返回顶部

英文来源：

The generative AI revolution hasn’t been kind to Vanniall, an OnlyFans creator who lives in New York City. She now constantly finds hyperrealistic deepfakes—AI-generated images and videos that copy everything about her—circulating online and often isn’t able to get them removed.
On top of that, Vanniall struggles to build an audience on popular social media platforms, like Instagram, without getting in trouble. “There’s always some sort of report or appeal that I'm going through with them,” she tells WIRED. Vanniall’s Instagram account, which has over 100,000 followers, is currently restricted and cannot be viewed without logging in.
So, when I tell her that Meta allows its AI agent, called Muse, to engage in explicit sexting with adult users, she seems frustrated by the decision: “It's not fair that they get to pull money out of people with their sexually active AI agent, but they won't let real people, real adults, engage in any sort of sensuality or sexuality.”
It’s a common refrain I heard from other adult content creators, who questioned why their accounts on Meta platforms often seem restricted, while Meta’s AI agent is now allowed to talk dirty with millions of adult users.
“A private, one-to-one conversation between an adult and an individualized AI agent on a platform restricted to people 18 and over is very different from the marketing and promotion of services on a social media platform,” Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton tells WIRED.
Meta’s Muse is the first always-on AI agent to break out of early adopter circles in San Francisco. The Muse app is like a message thread; text the digital assistant, give it access to your personal data, like calendar and email, and have it proactively find ways to help, like canceling a workout class that overlaps with your dinner reservation. Meta’s large distribution network, through platforms like Instagram and Facebook, helped catapult the app to the top of the download charts during its first month, as millions of new users experimented with an agent for the first time.
In addition to having it organize your calendar, Meta says, it’s OK for users of the adults-only app to engage in X-rated AI conversations with Muse. A Meta spokesperson previously told WIRED the company wouldn’t “block legal adult behavior.” Meta’s Muse generates explicit text but not images or videos.
While Meta takes a different approach to moderation on Instagram, other social media platforms in the United States do allow sexually explicit content. X remains one of the most popular platforms for many OnlyFans creators to draw in new subscribers and connect with fans. Many adult performers have also migrated to Bluesky after Elon Musk took over the platform formerly known as Twitter, where users can also share adult content.
“I think we're already seeing AI being allowed to do more than humans would get away with,” says Jiz Lee, who runs an OnlyFans account and has worked for years behind the scenes in queer porn. Meta has previously flagged Lee’s Instagram posts for removal. Lee feels like queer and trans people are often treated unfairly by large social media companies, whether or not the person is an adult content creator.
Lee traces many online censorship issues back to FOSTA-SESTA, a law signed by President Trump in 2018 that impacted Section 230 protections for platforms, and many websites responded by censoring adult content. “If sex work was decriminalized, then a lot of these issues wouldn't be happening, a lot of the censorship wouldn't be happening,” they say.
Lee also wants to know more about how Muse was trained and who, if anyone, was compensated by Meta for their data. “We've been slow to react industry-wise,” they say. But Lee is starting to see more adult content companies clarify AI usage stances in official contracts. They want to protect performers from being gobbled up into AI training data.
“When we're at award shows, and companies do advertisements for AI agents, they literally get booed like crazy,” says Tony Genius, who also has an OnlyFans account and appears in adult films. He has concerns about fully AI-generated porn in the future potentially displacing human performers. He also sees current AI tools as helpful for some marketing tasks independent creators do, like using automations to clip video segments for social media.
For many OnlyFans creators, navigating Meta platforms is frustrating but critical to remaining visible online. Genius claims to be on his seventh Instagram account in the past five years.
When asked about Muse’s sexting ability, he questioned why Meta made one of its apps, Muse, gated for those 18 and over but doesn’t seem interested in creating another adults-only space on social media. “It could be: Instacam,” he says.
Muse generating adult content could offer explicit AI interactions to a wider audience. Genius says he would be open to collaborating with a tech company to create an AI-version of himself that fans could message. He wants to find ways for humans to keep making money as adult performers, ensuring they aren’t cut out or unfairly trained on. Right now, he sees his human-ness and authenticity as central to connecting with audiences.
Meanwhile, Vanniall is fervently against using any AI agent. Well, at least, Meta’s Muse. “Stop downloading that app,” she says. “You do not need to give Meta any more money or any more of your personal information. They have enough.”
Comments
Back to top