内容来源：https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/14/anthropic-co-founder-confirms-the-company-briefed-the-trump-administration-on-mythos/

内容总结：

人工智能公司Anthropic联合创始人、公共事务负责人杰克·克拉克本周在塞马福尔全球经济峰会上证实，该公司已就新型AI模型"Mythos"向特朗普政府进行简报。该模型因具备强大的网络安全能力，被评估为"过于危险"而暂不向公众开放。

值得注意的是，此次简报发生在双方存在法律纠纷的背景下。今年3月，因美国国防部将Anthropic列为"供应链风险"企业，该公司正式提起诉讼。争议焦点在于军方是否应无限制使用其AI系统进行大规模监控和自主武器研发。克拉克在采访中将此纠纷淡化为"狭窄的合同争议"，强调公司始终重视国家安全合作。

"政府必须了解这些技术发展，"克拉克表示，"我们需要探索公私合作的新模式，这些正在变革经济的技术必然涉及国家安全层面。"他的表态印证了上周媒体关于特朗普政府鼓励摩根大通、高盛等五大银行测试Mythos模型的报道。

关于AI对社会就业的影响，克拉克与公司CEO达里奥·阿莫代存在微妙分歧。阿莫代曾警告AI可能导致失业率达到大萧条时期水平，但领导Anthropic经济学团队的克拉克指出，目前仅观察到部分行业"早期毕业生就业存在潜在疲软"。他建议大学生选择"跨学科综合与批判性思维"的专业方向，因为AI时代的关键能力在于"提出正确问题并融合多领域洞察的直觉"。

该公司表示已为可能出现的重大就业结构转变做好准备，并将继续就后续AI模型与政府保持沟通。

中文翻译：

Anthropic联合创始人、Anthropic PBC公共福利主管杰克·克拉克证实，这家AI公司已就新款Mythos模型向特朗普政府进行简报。该模型因宣称具备强大的网络安全能力，危险程度过高而于上周宣布不向公众开放。

在本周举行的Semafor全球经济峰会上，克拉克解释了公司为何在起诉美国政府的同时仍保持沟通。今年三月，美国国防部将Anthropic列为供应链风险企业后，该公司对五角大楼提起诉讼。双方争议焦点在于军方是否应无限制使用Anthropic的AI系统——包括对美国民众的大规模监控及全自动武器应用。（最终OpenAI获得了这份合同）

克拉克在峰会上淡化了政府将其列为供应链风险企业的决定，称这仅是"狭义的合同纠纷"，并强调公司对国家安全的高度重视不应因此被掩盖。"我们的立场是政府必须了解这些技术，必须探索与私营部门合作的新模式——这些企业正在创造彻底改变经济格局的产品，但其某些特性确实会触及国家安全、股权等敏感领域，"克拉克表示，"因此我们确实就Mythos与政府进行了沟通，未来也将持续通报后续模型进展。"

此番表态源于上周曝出的消息：特朗普政府官员正敦促摩根大通、高盛、花旗、美国银行和摩根士丹利等金融机构测试Mythos模型。访谈中克拉克还探讨了AI对社会其他方面的影响，包括失业问题与高等教育。

此前Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫迪曾警告，AI发展可能导致失业率达到大萧条时期水平，但克拉克持不同看法。他解释称，阿莫迪的预测基于"AI将以超预期速度迅猛发展"的判断。作为公司经济学家团队负责人，克拉克指出目前仅观察到部分行业"早期毕业生就业存在潜在疲软"，但公司已为可能出现的重大就业结构转变做好准备。

当被问及大学生应如何选择专业应对AI冲击时，克拉克建议选择那些"需要跨学科综合能力与分析思维"的领域。"AI能让我们随时调用各领域专家级的知识储备，"他解释道，"但真正的关键在于提出精准问题的能力，以及融合多学科见解形成创新方向的直觉。"

英文来源：

Jack Clark, one of Anthropic’s co-founders who also serves as Head of Public Benefit for Anthropic PBC, confirmed that the AI company had briefed the Trump administration about its new Mythos model.
The model, announced last week, is so dangerous that it’s not being released to the public, largely due to its alleged powerful cybersecurity capabilities.
In an interview at the Semafor World Economy summit this week, Clark explained why the company was still engaged with the U.S. government while simultaneously suing them.
This March, Anthropic filed a lawsuit against Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) after the agency labeled the company a supply-chain risk. Anthropic had clashed with the Pentagon over whether the military should have unrestricted access to Anthropic’s AI systems for use cases that included mass surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weapons. (OpenAI ended up winning the deal instead.)
At the conference, Clark downplayed the administration’s labeling of its business as a supply-chain risk, saying it was merely a “narrow contracting dispute” and that Anthropic didn’t want it to get in the way of the fact that the company cares about national security.
“Our position is the government has to know about this stuff, and we have to find new ways for the government to partner with a private sector that is making things that are truly revolutionizing the economy, but are going to have aspects to them which hit National Security, equities, and other ones,” said Clark. “So absolutely, we talked to them about Mythos, and we’ll talk to them about the next models as well.”
His confirmation comes after reports last week that Trump officials were encouraging banks to test Mythos, including JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley.
Clark also addressed other aspects of AI’s impact on society during the interview, including things like unemployment and higher education.
Previously, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that AI’s advances could bring unemployment to Depression-era numbers, but Clark slightly disagrees. He explained in the interview that Amodei believes that AI will get much more powerful than people expect very quickly, so he’s using that as the basis of his estimations.
Clark, who leads a team of economists at Anthropic, said that the company is so far only seeing “some potential weakness in early graduate employment” across select industries. He noted that Anthropic is ready in case there are major employment shifts, however.
Pushed to say what majors college students today should be pursuing or avoiding, as a result of AI’s impacts, Clark would only broadly suggest that the most important majors are those that “involve synthesis across a whole variety of subjects and analytical thinking about that.”
“That’s because what AI allows us to do is it allows you to have access to sort of an arbitrary amount of subject matter experts in different domains,” Clark said. “But the really important thing is knowing the right questions to ask and having intuitions about what would be interesting if you collided different insights from many different disciplines.”