内容来源：https://www.wired.com/story/teachers-deepfake-ai-students-content/

内容总结：

AI换脸色情图片泛滥，美国教师成为校园性骚扰新受害者

近期，美国多所学校曝出学生利用人工智能技术制作教师不雅图片和视频并进行传播的恶性事件，引发对校园安全和AI技术滥用的关注。多名受害教师向媒体透露，这些AI生成的色情内容给他们带来了巨大的精神困扰，并迫使他们重新审视自己的职业生涯。

加州洛斯巴诺斯市的代课教师路易斯·德桑蒂亚戈是最新一位受害者。今年3月，他在咖啡店兼职时收到同事消息，得知自己的一张照片被AI修改成穿着内衣、摆出挑逗姿势的图片，并在社交媒体上传播。德桑蒂亚戈随后发现，发布该图片的TikTok账号属于他所任职中学的一名学生，还有另一名学生创建了冒名账号。尽管校方对涉事学生进行了处理，但该图片仍在学生中持续扩散，甚至通过AirDrop在课堂上公然传播。德桑蒂亚戈表示，在问题得到彻底解决前，他不再考虑返回该学区工作。

类似事件并非个案。一名二十多岁的中学女教师透露，有学生将一位六十多岁女教师的公开照片进行AI处理，制作成色情图片在Snapchat群聊中分享。她还发现自己被AI生成了一段跳伞、后空翻甚至谈论性行为的虚假视频。尽管账号最终被删除，但涉事学生随后对她展开了持续数周的线下骚扰和辱骂。

英国一所职业学院的工作人员爱丽丝也遭遇了同样困境。她发现一段自己与学生的正常对话视频被人篡改，呈现为脱衣跳舞的画面。她怀疑此事与一名曾咨询过敏感话题的学生有关，该学生虽否认但很快退学。爱丽丝坦言，此事让她开始怀疑自己与学生的每一次交流，“让你开始质疑一切”。

亚利桑那州六年级教师卢克·雷德则被学生用AI制作了一张他与男同事接吻的虚假照片，并发布在他的公开TikTok账号评论区。涉事学生被处以三天停课处分，这是该校针对此类初犯的最重处罚。

法律专家指出，在未经同意的情况下传播AI生成的虚假不雅内容，可能构成网络跟踪骚扰，并违反美国联邦《采取行动法案》。该法案已将发布非自愿的“真实或计算机生成的私密图像”定为犯罪。

面对日益严重的AI滥用问题，教育工作者呼吁学校和家长加强对学生的数字伦理教育。正如雷德老师所言：“如今很多孩子不仅不理解自己的行为会对他人造成怎样的影响，更不明白网络世界的危险性。”

中文翻译：

对路易斯·德圣地亚哥来说，这位加州洛斯巴诺斯的代课老师，事情始于几条短信。3月12日，当他在咖啡店做另一份兼职时，手机亮了。一位同事咖啡师说社交媒体上流传着一张AI生成的照片。她表妹想知道照片上的人是不是德圣地亚哥。

起初，德圣地亚哥并不担心——他觉得不当照片违反TikTok社区准则，通常很快就会被删除。

“当我终于看到那张照片时，感觉就像腹部挨了一拳，”德圣地亚哥告诉《连线》杂志。照片的一部分像他记得在大学打工时拍过的一张镜子自拍。但穿的不是工作制服，而是内衣。而且不是像原照片那样正常站立，而是摆出挑逗的姿势。

这些短信开启了一场持续数月的事件，跨越两所学校，涉及学生和行政人员。而德圣地亚哥远非唯一以这种方式受害的教育工作者。

《连线》杂志采访了另外三位教师，他们声称学生用AI制作了他们的色情照片和视频。他们说这些事件让他们深感痛苦和失望——在某些情况下，这让他们重新审视自己对工作的看法以及与学生的关系。

“要记住这也可能涉及其他学生”

收到短信后，德圣地亚哥开始拼凑是谁可能制作了这张照片。一个分享该照片的账号在TikTok资料中使用了真实姓名——那是德圣地亚哥认识的当地中学的一名学生，他经常在那所学校代课。德圣地亚哥根据关注和与该账号互动的用户，以及他对学生朋友圈的了解，怀疑还有另外两名学生参与。他第二天本来就要去那所中学上班。

德圣地亚哥向副校长报告了这一事件，副校长向他保证学校会“处理这件事”。当晚晚些时候，他决定在TikTok上搜索自己的名字来找那张照片。他发现另一个学生创建了一个冒充他的账号——用了他的名字，拼写略有错误，头像用的就是那张照片。

德圣地亚哥说，在接下来的几周里，他与学校行政人员、学生家长甚至警方反复沟通。

“如果这些学生不怕生成并发布我的这些照片，我担心他们可能在短信和群聊中私下传播什么，”德圣地亚哥写信给校长说。“要记住这也可能涉及其他学生。”

一名承认制作了该照片的学生受到校内停课的处分。德圣地亚哥后来得知该照片也在Snapchat上被分享。但德圣地亚哥说照片继续扩散，其他学生开始发布它。他说他在TikTok账号上也收到了几条粗俗的性评论。

德圣地亚哥告诉行政人员，在“此事得到彻底解决之前”，他不愿意接受那所中学的代课任务。该学区未回应《连线》杂志的评论请求。

他在当地高中接了一个代课任务，但麻烦跟着他来了。在一节课上，他收到了通过AirDrop传输的那张AI生成照片，但很快就被撤回了。他看得出照片正在班里流传。

校长告诉他学校正在展开“立即调查”，并提出与德圣地亚哥会面或安排学校辅导员与他交谈，但德圣地亚哥说他今年可能不会再回该学区了。

他告诉《连线》杂志，至少目前，他觉得这样做不安全。

“它让你质疑一切”

当未经同意的成年人的伪造裸照被传播时，可能构成网络跟踪，并违反联邦《删除它法案》，该法案将在互联网上发布未经同意的“个人的私密视觉描绘，包括真实和计算机生成的”定为犯罪。

在与《连线》杂志分享的大多数案例中，教师并未直接向内容出现的平台举报。Snap发言人莫妮克·贝拉米分享了公司关于骚扰和性内容的政策，该政策禁止分享AI生成或操纵内容来羞辱他人或进行性骚扰。她告诉《连线》杂志，公司有“既定流程”用于举报此类内容，并继续“开发功能工具以支持我们社区的安全、隐私和福祉”。TikTok在发布前未提供评论。

退休的就业维权律师唐娜·鲍尔曼告诉《连线》杂志，如果学生制作并分享教师的性图像，这构成了工作场所性骚扰的“明确案例”。

鲍尔曼说，根据联邦反歧视法，雇主有义务创造没有性骚扰的工作场所。在学校中，这可能意味着对学生进行纪律处分或将其调到不同的班级。不过她补充说，学校如何应对这些事件“没有蓝本”。行政人员甚至不必告诉受害教师学生受到了怎样的纪律处分。

“他们只需要为受害者营造一个安全的环境，”鲍尔曼说。

一位二十多岁的中学女教师告诉《连线》杂志，她看到太多用AI生成内容骚扰教师的情况，已经在为下一波做准备。（她要求匿名，因为她没有得到学区许可谈论自己的经历。）

她说，去年，学生们找到了一位六十多岁教师的公开照片，操纵照片使其看起来像在做性行为，并在Snapchat群聊中互相分享。

这位教师说，几个月前，她从一名学生那里得知有一个冒充她的TikTok账号。它看起来是AI生成的——她的脸具有AI生成内容的特征性光滑感，说话时嘴巴动作不自然，声音听起来也不像她。有些视频展示她做跳伞或后空翻之类的事情。但其他视频则描绘她谈论自己做过和喜欢做的性行为。

她说她告诉了校长这个账号，校长向她保证会“看看我们能做什么”。整整一天，学生们不断提醒她那个账号。她说有些学生告诉她他们知道是谁创建的——是他们的一个同学。她说那个学生以行为问题著称。

“我知道很多向我举报的孩子真心相信那就是我的账号，相信我说了那些话，”她告诉《连线》杂志。“我当时说，‘天哪，你们——那不是我。’”她让他们向TikTok举报，她说账号很快被删除了。

仍然心有余悸的她，在下一次月度教师会议上提到了那个TikTok账号。一位同事说他看到过一个看似AI生成的自己被捕的假视频，他认为是同一个学生制作的。

她说，随着日子一天天过去，她成了这名学生不断升级的面对面骚扰目标，他开始“骂我、给我起外号、叫我滚开、骂我婊子”。她在下一次教职工会议上提了出来，副校长说同一名学生半夜给他们打电话发短信，并在TikTok上发布看似AI生成的他们的照片。

她说校长把那个学生从她的班上调走了，并尽量限制他接触她。但她说骚扰一直持续到那个学生最终离开学区，TikTok也删除了那个账号。

她说这些行为问题并非这名学生独有。“我们遇到这种事并不意外，因为这些孩子就是很难管，”她说。“我只是担心这种事会再次发生。”

其他教师说他们的经历从根本上改变了他们与学生相处的方式。

爱丽丝（要求仅以名字称呼）在一所英国学院工作，该学院培训16至19岁的学生学习建筑等技能。她的工作结合了行政职责（如考勤）和学院辅导员的角色。她说她全年与大约150名学生单独会面，并为自己能充当倾听者、给他们建议并担任导师而感到自豪。

她说，今年冬天，学校行政人员告诉她，一名学生提交了一份报告，声称有两段视频在同学中流传。一段看起来是真实的，显示她正在与一名学生交谈。另一段，他们说，看起来是第一段的操纵版本。但不是在和学生说话，而是她在脱衣服，穿着内衣或比基尼跳舞。

爱丽丝告诉《连线》杂志，作为一名合格青年工作者，她的部分工作经常涉及谈论学生可能“不好意思告诉父母”的事情，比如毒品、派对或安全性行为。她说她与怀疑制作视频的那名学生进行过几次这样的对话。该学生在被行政人员询问时予以否认，不久就退学了。（该学院未回应《连线》杂志的评论请求。）

“这也让我反思那些对话，想着，他是不是觉得因为我们在讨论这些话题，他就可以越界？”她说。“它让你质疑一切，”她说。

事后，学院允许她离开班级几周，并采取措施教育学生制作或传播深度伪造的危险。但她说，当她回来时，气氛已经变冷了。

“我和我的学生关系确实很好——我确实和我的学生关系很好，”她说。她仍然热爱她的工作。“但这确实让我在面对人时更加谨慎、更加警惕了。”

“这就越线了”

和德圣地亚哥一样，亚利桑那州的六年级教师卢克·雷德说，他的学生在自己公开TikTok账号的评论区传播了一张AI生成的照片。照片描绘他和另一位男老师接吻。

雷德说他向TikTok举报了这些账号——不是因为内容违规，而是因为年龄低于13岁的最低年龄限制——但他说TikTok没有删除这些账号。他说学校立即展开调查，迅速确定了学生身份，该学生承认制作并分享了该照片。该学生被停课三天——根据学区手册，这是该年龄段学生首次性骚扰违规可以受到的最严重处罚。该学区未回应《连线》杂志的评论请求。

雷德告诉《连线》杂志，反思这段经历“让我陷入了漩涡”。他说，他的担忧不一定关乎发生在自己身上的事。更多是关注学生中间围绕AI使用的那种热情、放任的文化。

“已经到了学生们觉得制作不当图片很自在的地步，”雷德说。“显然，当你用这些图片让你的老师做性行为时，这就越线了。”

最终，他为自己感到遗憾的程度不如为学生感到遗憾。

“很明显，现在很多孩子不仅不明白自己的行为会如何影响他人，也不明白互联网上会发生什么，以及它有多危险，”雷德说。

评论

返回顶部

英文来源：

For Luis DeSantiago, a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, it started with a few text messages. On March 12, as he was working his other part-time job at a coffee shop, his phone lit up. A fellow barista said there was an AI photo circulating on social media. Her cousin wanted to know if it was DeSantiago.
At first, DeSantiago wasn’t worried—he figured that inappropriate photos violated TikTok’s community guidelines and were usually quickly removed.
“When I finally saw the image, that’s when it felt like a punch to the gut,” DeSantiago tells WIRED. Parts of it resembled a mirror selfie that he remembered taking at a job in college. But instead of his work uniform, he was wearing lingerie. And instead of standing normally, as he had been in the original photo, he was posing suggestively.
The texts kicked off a monthslong saga that crossed two schools and involved students and administrators. And DeSantiago is far from the only educator who’s been victimized this way.
WIRED spoke with three other teachers who allege that their students made sexualized photos and videos of them, likely using AI. They say the incidents have been profoundly distressing and disappointing—and in some cases, it’s led them to reassess how they view their work and their relationships with their students.
“This Could Include Other Students”
After he received the texts, DeSantiago began to piece together who might have been behind the image. One account that shared it used their real name in their TikTok profile—it was a student DeSantiago knew from the local middle school, where he regularly filled in. DeSantiago suspected the involvement of two other students based on people who followed and interacted with that account, and his knowledge of student friend groups. He was scheduled to work at that very middle school the next day.
DeSantiago reported the incident to the assistant principal, who assured him that the school would "take care of it.” Later that evening, he decided to look for the image by searching his name on TikTok. He discovered that a different student had created an account impersonating him—it used his name, slightly mispelled, and had the same photo as their profile picture.
Over the next few weeks, DeSantiago says, he went back and forth with school administrators, the parents of the students, and even the police.
“If these students aren't afraid of generating and posting these images of me, I am concerned of what they may be circulating privately through text messages and group chats,” DeSantiago wrote to the principal. “Keep in mind this could include other students as well.”
One student, who admitted to creating the image, was disciplined with in-school suspension. DeSantiago was later told that the image was also shared on Snapchat. But DeSantiago says the image continued to proliferate, and other students began posting it. He says he also received several crude, sexual comments on his TikTok account.
DeSantiago told administrators he didn’t want to take assignments at the middle school “until this matter is fully addressed.” The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.
He took a substitute assignment at the local high school, but the problems followed him. During one class, he received an AirDropped photo of the same AI-generated image before it was quickly revoked. He could tell it was circulating among the class.
The principal told him the school was launching an “immediate investigation” and offered to meet with DeSantiago or make the school counselor available, but DeSantiago says he probably won’t return to the district this year.
He tells WIRED that, at least right now, he doesn’t feel safe doing so.
“It Makes You Question Everything”
When fake nude images of nonconsenting adults are disseminated, it could constitute cyberstalking and violate the federal Take It Down Act, which makes it a crime to publish nonconsensual “intimate visual depictions of individuals, both authentic and computer-generated,” on the internet.
In most of the accounts shared with WIRED, the teachers didn't directly report the content to the platforms on which it appeared. Snap spokesperson Monique Bellamy shared the company's policies on harassment and sexual content, which prohibit sharing AI-generated or manipulated content to humiliate or sexually harass others. She told WIRED that the company has "established processes" for reporting such content, and that it continues to "develop features and tools designed to support the safety, privacy, and well-being of our community." TikTok did not provide comment before publication.
Donna Ballman, a retired employment advocacy lawyer, tells WIRED that if a student creates and shares sexual images of a teacher, it constitutes a “clear case” of sexual harassment in the workplace.
Ballman says that under federal antidiscrimination laws, employers have an obligation to create a workplace free of sexual harassment. In a school, this could mean disciplining the student or moving them to a different classroom. She adds, however, that there's “no blueprint” for how schools need to respond to these incidents. Administrators don’t even have to tell a victimized teacher how a student may have been disciplined.
“They just have to make [and] create a safe environment for the victim,” Ballman says.
One middle school teacher in her mid-twenties tells WIRED that she’s seen so much AI-generated content used to harass teachers that she’s bracing for the next wave. (She requested anonymity because she did not have permission from her school district to speak about her experience.)
Last year, she says, students found public photos of a teacher in her sixties, manipulated them to make it appear that she was committing sex acts, and shared them with each other in a Snapchat group chat.
A few months ago, the teacher says, she learned from a student about a TikTok account impersonating her. It looked AI-generated—her face had the characteristic smoothness of AI-generated content, her mouth was moving unnaturally while speaking, and the sound of her voice didn’t match her own. Some of the videos showed her doing things like skydiving or backflips. But others depicted her talking about sexual acts she performed and enjoyed.
She says she told her principal about the account and that they assured her that they would “see what we can do.” Throughout the day, students continued to warn her about the account. She says that some told her that they knew who made the account—one of their classmates. She says the student was known to have behavioral problems.
“I know a lot of the kids that reported it to me genuinely believed that was my account, and that I was saying those things,” she tells WIRED. “I was like, ‘Oh my god, you guys—that is not me.’” She asked them to report it to TikTok, and she says the account was quickly taken down.
Still unnerved by the incident, she mentioned the TikTok account during the next monthly teacher meeting. A colleague said he had seen a seemingly AI-generated fake video of himself getting arrested, which he believed was generated by the same student.
As days and weeks passed, she says, she became the target of escalating, in-person harassment from this same student, who began “cursing me out, calling me names, telling me to fuck off, calling me a bitch.” She raised it at the next faculty meeting, and the assistant principal said that the same student was calling and texting them in the middle of the night and posting apparent AI-generated photos of them to TikTok.
She says the principal removed the student from her class and tried to limit his access to her. But she says that the harassment continued until the student ultimately left the district, and TikTok removed the account.
She says that these behavioral issues aren’t exclusive to this particular student. “It's kind of unsurprising that we are dealing with that, because these kids just have a hard time,” she says. "I'm just worried about this happening again.”
Other teachers say their experiences have fundamentally changed the way they relate to students.
Alice, who asked to be identified by her first name, works for a UK college that trains students aged 16 to 19 in trades like construction. Her job combines administrative responsibilities, like taking attendance, with the role of a college counselor. She says she individually meets with about 150 students throughout the year and takes pride in being able to be a sounding board, give them advice, and serve as a mentor.
This winter, she says, school administrators told her that a student filed a report claiming two videos were circulating among his classmates. One appeared to be real, and it showed her having a conversation with a student. The other one, they said, appeared to be a manipulated version of the first. But instead of talking to the student, it showed her taking her clothes off and dancing around in what was either underwear or a bikini.
Alice tells WIRED that as a qualified youth worker, part of her job often involves talking about things that students may feel “too embarrassed to tell their parents about,” like drugs, parties, or having safe sex. She says she had several of those conversations with the student she suspected had created the video. The student denied it when questioned by administrators and soon dropped out of the school. (The college did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.)
“It makes me reflect as well on those conversations, thinking, did he think that he could overstep a line because we were having these discussions?” she says. “It makes you question everything,” she says.
Afterward, the college gave her permission to step away from the class for a few weeks and took steps to educate students about the danger of creating or distributing deepfakes. But when she returned, she says, the atmosphere had chilled.
“I did have a really good rapport with my students—I do have a good rapport with my students,” she says. And she still loves her work. “But it's definitely made me a bit more cautious, a bit more vigilant when it comes to folks.”
“It Crosses the Line”
Like DeSantiago, Arizona-based sixth-grade teacher Luke Red says his students circulated an AI-generated photo of him in the comments of his public TikTok account. The image depicted him and another male teacher kissing each other.
Red says he reported the accounts to TikTok—not for content violations but for being under the minimum age of 13—but says TikTok didn’t remove the accounts. He says that the school immediately launched an investigation and quickly identified the student, who admitted to creating and sharing the image. The student received a three-day suspension—the most severe punishment kids their age can receive for a first-time sexual harassment offense, according to the school district handbook. The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.
Red tells WIRED that reflecting on the experience “has kind of sent me into a spiral.” His concerns, he says, are not necessarily about what happened to him. They’re more focused on the enthusiastic, permissive culture surrounding AI use among his students.
“It just got to the point where students felt comfortable enough creating inappropriate images,” Red says. “Obviously when you're making your teachers do sexual things with these images, that's where it crosses the line.”
Ultimately, he feels more sorry for the students than for himself.
“It's just clear [that] so many kids nowadays just don't understand not only how what they're doing can affect others, but just what happens on the internet and how dangerous it can be,” Red says.
Comments
Back to top